Political Awareness

Note: Political Awareness never authorizes any candidate or their committees to publish its communication.

AI, Disinformation, and Election Security

For most of American history, election security focused on physical threats: ballot tampering, voter intimidation, corrupted machines, or poorly safeguarded polling places. The concerns were concrete and visible. But the rise of artificial intelligence has fundamentally changed the landscape. The most dangerous threats to elections are now digital, invisible, and often undetectable until after the damage is done.

Today’s elections do not fail because someone breaks into a ballot box. They fail because someone manipulates what millions of voters believe to be true.

Artificial intelligence has supercharged that problem. New tools can create convincing fake videos, generate targeted misinformation at scale, imitate trusted voices, and tailor messages to individual psychological profiles. Domestic political actors, foreign governments, extremist networks, and financially motivated groups now have access to tools once available only to intelligence agencies.

The question facing America is no longer whether elections can be influenced. It is whether election systems — and the public that relies on them — can withstand this new era of algorithmic manipulation.

The Evolution of Disinformation: From Rumors to Algorithms

Disinformation is not new. Rumors, propaganda, and political deceit have shaped societies for centuries. What is new is speed, scale, and believability.

Before AI, misinformation required effort. It took time to write posts, fabricate images, or organize influence campaigns. Today, automated systems can generate thousands of

convincing messages, comments, or narratives instantly. Synthetic actors — bots, AI-generated personas, and coordinated “sockpuppet” networks — can flood online spaces with persuasive arguments indistinguishable from real people.

This is not simply an increase in quantity. It is an increase in sophistication. AI systems can:

• create realistic personas with full digital histories
• generate language that mimics human emotional patterns
• insert content into niche communities with tailored messaging
• respond to users in real time
• exploit cultural grievances or political anxieties
• amplify divisive topics to fracture coalitions

Disinformation is no longer a blunt instrument. It is a precision-engineered tool.

Deepfakes and Synthetic Media: A Crisis of Reality

Among the most powerful AI threats to election security is the rise of deepfakes — hyper-realistic videos or audio recordings created by generative models. These tools can visually mimic political leaders, public figures, journalists, or everyday citizens.

A single deepfake released at the wrong moment — during a debate, on the eve of an election, or in response to breaking news — can change public sentiment before fact-checkers even begin to react.

Deepfakes are dangerous because they weaponize the most trusted form of evidence: visual proof. When video becomes unreliable, the public loses the ability to distinguish truth from fabrication.

This leads to a second danger: the liar’s dividend — when real events are dismissed as fake, giving politicians cover to deny genuine wrongdoing. In an environment where everything can be faked, nothing is trusted.

Foreign Governments in the Digital Arena

Foreign interference is not hypothetical. It is documented history. But AI has transformed the threat.

Where foreign governments once needed large influence teams to infiltrate online spaces, they can now deploy AI models to generate content in dozens of languages, pose as domestic citizens, and exploit existing political tensions with uncanny cultural fluency.

Foreign AI-driven campaigns can:

• insert disinformation into local Facebook groups
• impersonate activists or community leaders
• manipulate trending topics
• create fabricated news outlets
• push extremist narratives
• promote apathy and voter disengagement

Foreign actors no longer need deep understanding of American society. They can rely on AI systems trained on public data to identify vulnerabilities and craft divisive messages automatically.

This is not science fiction. Intelligence agencies across the world have already documented these tactics in election cycles from 2016 to 2024. The tools are improving faster than defensive capabilities.

Domestic Influence Campaigns: The Disinformation Marketplace

Foreign interference receives most of the attention, but the fastest-growing threat is domestic. AI tools are now used by:

• political operatives
• advocacy groups
• influencers seeking profit
• conspiracy networks
• extremist organizations
• politically motivated individuals

These actors benefit from weak regulation, cheap technology, and minimal accountability. Many disinformation campaigns now operate as online businesses, generating revenue through ads, merchandise, or donations.

AI models make these operations highly scalable. One individual can run a network of dozens of fake accounts, each posting persuasive content generated by large language models. These networks are harder to detect because they reflect American cultural and political patterns, rather than foreign fingerprints.

When disinformation becomes a business model, the threat becomes permanent.

Election Infrastructure in the Age of AI

Election systems do not exist in isolation. They rely on:

• voter registration databases
• poll worker communications
• public information channels
• official websites
• emergency response coordination
• media coverage
• and public perception

AI threats target these surrounding systems. Synthetic emails can trick election workers into sharing passwords. Deepfake emergency alerts can panic voters. AI-generated misinformation can depress turnout in targeted communities.

Election officials warn that the greatest vulnerability is public confidence. If enough voters believe the process is compromised, actual security becomes irrelevant. Elections depend on trust.

AI undermines that trust quietly, repeatedly, and often invisibly.

Micro-Targeting: When AI Knows the Voter Better Than the Voter Knows Themselves

AI models can analyze thousands of data points — browsing habits, search history, liked posts, purchase records, email subscriptions — to predict what messages will resonate most with a specific individual.

Political advertisers and advocacy groups use these tools to:

• identify emotional triggers
• tailor messaging based on personality models
• test thousands of variants simultaneously
• target voters at moments of high receptivity
• reinforce confirmation bias
• push undecided voters toward apathy or outrage

This level of precision raises ethical questions. Elections were once influenced through shared information. Today, many voters experience a completely customized reality. When citizens no longer share a common set of facts, democracy becomes fragmented.

The Apathy Strategy: Depress, Don’t Persuade

AI disinformation campaigns often aim not to convince voters to support a candidate — but to convince them to stay home. The most effective strategies exploit:

• cynicism
• fatigue
• distrust
• hopelessness
• confusion
• information overload

When citizens feel overwhelmed or misled, they disengage. AI can generate endless waves of conflicting narratives designed specifically to exhaust critical thinking.

Elections become battles not just for votes, but for the public’s will to participate.

Election Security Officials Are Overwhelmed

Election security experts face a near-impossible challenge:

• verify millions of online claims
• respond faster than misinformation spreads
• coordinate across thousands of jurisdictions
• maintain public trust under hostile scrutiny
• counter foreign and domestic actors simultaneously
• educate voters about synthetic content
• address disinformation without appearing partisan

Many election offices are underfunded, understaffed, and technologically outdated. AI threats evolve faster than public institutions can respond.

This imbalance creates a dangerous reality: the tools to undermine elections are growing faster than the tools to protect them.

The Legal Vacuum: Technology Outpacing Regulation

American law has not caught up to AI. Key challenges include:

• deepfake regulations vary by state
• federal standards for political AI content do not exist
• online platforms set inconsistent enforcement rules
• First Amendment protections complicate restriction
• foreign interference laws are outdated
• oversight bodies lack authority and resources

Democracies around the world face this dilemma. How do you regulate tools that can be used for both creativity and manipulation, for both legitimate speech and political sabotage?

The United States has yet to answer that question.

Restoring Trust in the Information Environment

Rebuilding election security requires more than technological fixes. It requires cultural and institutional change.

Potential strategies include:

• independent deepfake detection systems
• rapid public alerts for synthetic content
• transparency rules for AI-generated political ads
• improved digital literacy programs
• updated election security funding
• coordinated federal-state response teams
• strengthened platform accountability
• secure communication tools for election workers

But technology alone cannot solve a trust crisis. Democracy relies on shared facts, honest debate, and good-faith engagement. Restoring these requires political leadership, bipartisan commitment, and public awareness.

A Future at the Crossroads

Artificial intelligence is neither inherently good nor inherently harmful. Its impact depends on how society chooses to regulate it, integrate it, and defend against its misuse. But one truth is unavoidable:

Democracy cannot function if citizens do not know what is real.

 The challenge is not only technological. It is philosophical. America must decide whether it will allow reality itself to become a tool of political warfare.

If elections are to remain legitimate, if public trust is to endure, and if democracy is to survive the next era of information conflict, the country must build resilience against AI-driven deception now — not after the next crisis.