Political Awareness

Note: Political Awareness’s published communication is never authorized by any candidate or their committees.

The Deep Interdependence of the U.S.-China Economic Relationship

The economic relationship between the United States and China is a cornerstone of the global economy, characterized by deep interdependence and significant trade flows. However, this relationship is also marked by a persistent and substantial trade imbalance. Where the U.S. imports considerably more goods from China than it exports. China stands as a pivotal trade partner for the United States. Distinguished as the leading exporter of goods to the U.S. market. This significant trade relationship has been cultivated over several decades, fostering deep economic ties. However, a notable shift occurred when China acceded to the World Trade Organization in 2001, leading to a subsequent decrease in trade volumes.

Shifts in Trade Volume and the Impact of WTO Membership

This transition marks a critical juncture in the evolving dynamics of U.S.-China trade relations- “According to UN statistics, in 2024, US goods exports to China reached US$143.55 billion, representing a 648.4 percent increase from US$19.18 billion in 2001, which far exceeded its overall export growth of 183.1 percent during the same period” (高瞻, 2025). This imbalance started in 2018 during President Trump first tenure, and it has been a long-standing source of economic and political friction. Raising concerns about its implications for jobs, national debt, and economic competitiveness. Understanding the underlying causes, multifaceted consequences, and potential solutions to this issue is crucial for policymakers, businesses, and economists alike.

The Trump Administration and the Initiation of the Trade War

During his first term, President Donald Trump initiated a trade war, primarily targeting China, to reduce the trade deficit and protect American industries. He imposed tariffs on billions of dollars worth of imported goods, prompting retaliatory measures from other countries. These actions disrupted global supply chains and increased costs for businesses and consumers. The economic impact of the trade war was widely debated, with some sectors experiencing negative effects while others saw potential benefits.

Escalation and Continuation of Tariffs

Negotiations between the U.S. and China led to a phase-one trade deal, but many tariffs remained in place. Few months into his second term, Trump further escalated the trade war by raising tariffs on certain goods- “Trump has threatened tariffs as high as 145 percent on all Chinese goods, and Beijing’s latest retaliatory tariffs on U.S. imports are as high as 125 percent.” (Siripurapu et al., 2024). This move aimed to increase pressure on trading partners and further advance his protectionist trade agenda. The continuation and intensification of these policies underscored Trump’s commitment to reshaping international trade relations.

Domestic Macro Forces as Key Drivers of Trade Imbalances

The article “Trade Balances in China and the U.S. Are Largely Driven by Domestic Macro Forces” offers a compelling analysis of the key factors influencing trade dynamics between these two major economies. Contrary to popular belief, the authors argue that domestic macroeconomic forces. Rather than international trade policies or currency manipulation, are the primary drivers of trade balances (Gourinchas et al., 2024). They delve into an examination of internal economic factors such as fiscal policy, investment trends, and domestic consumption patterns. These elements, they contend, exert a more substantial impact on shaping trade balances than external trade measures.

Challenging Conventional Wisdom: Internal Factors and Policy Implications

By presenting this perspective, the article challenges conventional wisdom and provides a more nuanced understanding of the intricate relationship between domestic economies and international trade. The authors support their argument with detailed economic data and policy analysis. Offering a fresh perspective on the complexities of U.S.-China trade relations. The article suggests that policymakers should focus on domestic economic strategies to address trade imbalances effectively.

Political and Strategic Roots of the Trade War

In “The U.S.-China Trade War: A Political and Economic Analysis,” Yuhan Zhang delves into the multifaceted causes and potential consequences of the escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. Zhang argues that the trade war is not solely an economic dispute but is deeply rooted in political and strategic rivalries. She claims that the U.S. aims to curb China’s growing economic influence and technological advancements through tariffs and trade barriers.

Structural and Policy-Related Factors Contributing to the Imbalance

The analysis also highlights the potential negative impacts on global supply chains, economic growth, and international relations. Emphasizing the need for a more cooperative and balanced approach to trade relations between the two economic giants. “The trade imbalance is a structural problem. China’s problematic development model, in conjunction with the US capital account surpluses thanks to the country’s sublime capital markets, has contributed to the US current account deficit” (Zheng, 2018). Building on Zhang’s analysis, the trade imbalance is further complicated by factors such as intellectual property theft, non-tariff barriers, and state subsidies, which distort fair competition.

Lower Production Costs and Market Dynamics

These issues, combined with the U.S.’s focus on high-end manufacturing and services, contribute to a trade dynamic where China excels in exports due to lower production costs and government support. Zhang likely argues that addressing the trade imbalance requires not only rectifying China’s development model but also resolving issues related to market access, intellectual property protection, and regulatory transparency. The article suggests that a comprehensive approach is necessary to achieve a more balanced and sustainable trade relationship between the U.S. and China.

Reevaluating the Narrative: Jeremy Haft’s Perspective

According to Jeremy Haft, a former Adjunct professor at Georgetown University and the author of  “Decoding U.S.-China Trade,” Haft challenges the conventional narrative surrounding the U.S.-China trade dynamic. Haft argues that the perceived trade imbalance, often viewed through outdated metrics, is a misconception. He asserts, “Yes, there is an imbalance between the economies of China and the U.S., but financially, demographically, and geographically, it is highly in the favor of the U.S. The trade imbalance, construed through 17th-century trade numbers, is a mirage” (Haft, 2019). Haft contends that imposing tariffs to rectify this illusory imbalance will be counterproductive, stating, “Because the U.S.-China trade war, waged through tariffs to eliminate this illusory trade imbalance. Will do nothing to deter China from following what it deems in its own best interests. But instead, will kill jobs across America and cede large swaths of market share to U.S. competitors” (Haft, 2019). Instead, Haft suggests that the U.S. should focus on leveraging its inherent advantages to foster a more balanced and mutually beneficial economic relationship with China.

Impact of U.S.-China Tensions on Citizens and Global Mobility

Other than economic effects, the trade war also affects citizens mobility, as highlighted by Wang et al. in their article “The Impact of U.S.-China Tensions on People Mobility.” The authors find a notable decrease in passenger traffic from China to knowledge-intensive areas in the U.S. since 2018. They note, “shows that the post-2018 U.S.-China tensions have already led to an alarmingly significant drop in the number of passengers traveling from China to knowledge-intensive destinations in the U.S., more than that is observed for air traffic from other countries and that for other U.S. destinations” (Wang et. al. 2023) This decline suggests that political tensions are impacting academic, business, and personal exchanges, potentially hindering collaboration and knowledge transfer between the two countries. Wang et al.’s analysis highlights the broader implications of geopolitical friction on people mobility and its potential long-term effects on U.S.-China relations.

Currency Manipulation, Intellectual Property, and Subsidies

The trade imbalance is not solely a result of comparative advantages; currency manipulation, intellectual property theft, and state-sponsored subsidies further contribute to the problem. China has been accused of undervaluing its currency, the yuan, to make its exports more competitive and cheaper. Distorting the market and making it more difficult for U.S. companies to compete. Furthermore, intellectual property theft, including the pirating of software, counterfeit goods, and the unauthorized use of patents and trademarks, costs U.S. businesses billions of dollars each year.

State-sponsored subsidies, which provide financial assistance to Chinese companies, give them an unfair advantage in the global market. In a New York Times article titled “The U.S. Labeled China a Currency Manipulator. Here’s What It Means,” Ana Swanson explores the implications of such accusations. Swanson notes that “Currency manipulation will also matter in the trade war, as President Trump ratchets up tariffs on Chinese goods. A cheaper Chinese currency helps Beijing offset much of the pain of American tariffs, which otherwise would make Chinese goods considerably cheaper in the United States” (Swanson, 2019).

Strategic Maneuvers and U.S. Policy Responses

This highlights a critical dynamic: by devaluing its currency, China can mitigate the impact of U.S. tariffs, maintaining its export competitiveness. This strategic maneuver complicates efforts to address the trade imbalance, as it allows China to absorb some of the economic pressure imposed by tariffs. The U.S. labeling China as a currency manipulator shows the seriousness of these concerns. The potential for further escalation in trade tensions.

Following the designation, The Treasury argues that “the context of these actions and the implausibility of China’s market stability rationale confirm that the purpose of China’s currency devaluation is to gain an unfair competitive advantage in international trade” (U.S. Department of the Treasury, 2019). The U.S. Treasury engages with international organizations like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to address the currency manipulation issue. This involves urging China to adopt transparent and market-oriented exchange rate practices. The Treasury also seeks to negotiate bilateral agreements to correct the undervaluation and promote fair trade.

Long-term Economic and Social Impacts

These actions are intended to protect American businesses and workers from unfair competition. Ultimately, the goal is to ensure a level playing field in global trade and foster sustainable economic growth. Addressing these multifaceted issues requires a comprehensive approach that includes not only tariffs but also diplomatic and legal measures to combat currency manipulation, intellectual property theft, and unfair subsidies. The consequences of the trade imbalance are far-reaching and affect various aspects of the U.S. economy. While American consumers have benefited from lower prices on a wide range of goods. The trade deficit has contributed to job losses in certain sectors, particularly manufacturing. As companies move production to China to take advantage of lower costs, U.S. workers may face layoffs or reduced wages.

Diverse Perspectives on the Impact of the Trade War

However, the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) presents a contrasting viewpoint in Aditya Jain’s article, “How a Trade War with China Benefits U.S. Companies.” Jain explores potential advantages for U.S. firms amidst trade tensions. Arguing that some companies may see increased domestic production and market share. This perspective adds complexity to the narrative, suggesting that the impact of trade imbalances and trade disputes is not uniformly negative. As Jain notes, “As U.S. policymakers debate ways to address China’s global political influence, trade with China has become a complex issue involving not just political and national security dimensions but also one that involves the economic interests of large U.S. companies” (Jain, 2025).  This illustrates the multifaceted nature of the trade relationship, extending beyond simple economic gains or losses.

The Need for a Balanced and Strategic Approach

The debate over trade with China encompasses political, security, and corporate interests, making it a highly contentious issue. Policymakers must consider these diverse factors when formulating trade strategies. The situation calls for a comprehensive approach that balances the needs of consumers, workers, and businesses. It also requires careful consideration of the broader geopolitical implications. Ultimately, understanding the nuances of this complex trade relationship is crucial for crafting effective and equitable policies.

The Need for a Balanced and Strategic Approach

The trade deficit has also led to increased national debt, as the U.S. borrows money from other countries to finance its imports. Accoring to The Hill, “The Federal Government spent much more than it earned — it ran a budget deficit of more than 6 percent of GDP. That has pushed the country’s trade deficit to roughly 3 percent of GDP, financed by foreign borrowing” (Kamin, 2025). This can have long-term implications for the U.S. economy, including higher interest rates and reduced investment. Addressing the trade imbalance requires a multifaceted approach that includes negotiations, investments, and policy changes.

Strategies for Future U.S.-China Trade Relations

The U.S. government must engage in tough negotiations with China to address issues such as currency manipulation, intellectual property theft, and state-sponsored subsidies. These negotiations should aim to create a level playing field for U.S. businesses and ensure fair trade practices. Additionally, the U.S. needs to invest in its manufacturing sector to increase its competitiveness. This includes providing incentives for companies to invest in new technologies, training workers for high-skilled jobs, and reducing regulatory burdens.

Furthermore, policies to protect intellectual property and promote fair trade practices are essential. The U.S. government should strengthen its enforcement of intellectual property rights and work with international organizations to combat counterfeiting and piracy. It should also use trade remedies, such as tariffs and quotas, to address unfair trade practices and protect domestic industries (TFL, 2025). Addressing the U.S.-China trade imbalance is a complex and challenging task. But it is crucial for ensuring the long-term health and competitiveness of the U.S. economy. By understanding the causes, consequences, and potential solutions. Policymakers, businesses, and economists can work together to create a more balanced and sustainable trade relationship between the two countries. This will require a commitment to fair trade practices, investments in domestic industries, and policies that promote innovation and economic growth.

References: