Zero-Migration America?

Demographics, Immigration, and the Future of Social Security & Medicare

The Demographic Inflection Point

In October 2025, The Economist published an article titled “Welcome to Zero-Migration America,” exploring the possibility that U.S. net migration could fall to zero — meaning as many people leaving as entering — for the first time in modern history.

Whether that scenario proves temporary or structural remains uncertain. But the demographic implications are measurable.

For decades, the United States maintained a quiet structural advantage over peer economies:

Higher fertility than most of Europe
Sustained immigration flows
A comparatively younger workforce That advantage has narrowed.

The U.S. fertility rate has remained below the replacement level of 2.1 births per woman for over a decade. Recent data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention place it closer to

1.6. At the same time, immigration flows have fluctuated sharply due to policy changes, global instability, and post-pandemic administrative constraints.

If birth rates remain low and net migration slows structurally, the result is not dramatic. It is mathematical:

Slower labor force growth.

And entitlement systems depend on labor force growth.

How Social Security Works

The Social Security Administration administers Social Security primarily as a pay-as-you-go system.

Current workers fund current retirees through payroll taxes. The sustainability of the system depends heavily on the worker-to-beneficiary ratio.

That ratio has been declining for decades:

1960: ~5 workers per retiree
2000: ~3.4 workers per retiree
2023: ~2.7 workers per retiree
Projected 2035: ~2.3 workers per retiree The causes are structural:
Retirement of the Baby Boom generation
Increased longevity
Lower birth rates

Immigration has historically moderated the pace of decline because immigrants tend to be younger and working-age when they arrive, contributing payroll taxes before drawing benefits decades later.

If net migration approaches zero for sustained periods, that moderating effect weakens.

Trust Fund Projections: What “Depletion” Really Means

According to the 2024 Social Security Trustees Report, the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund is projected to face depletion in the early-to-mid 2030s.

Clarity matters.

Depletion does not mean collapse.

Even if the trust fund balance reaches zero, ongoing payroll taxes would still cover approximately 75–80% of scheduled benefits absent legislative reform.

The system continues.

But benefits would adjust automatically unless Congress intervenes. Demographics influence the timing and scale of reform pressure.

Slower workforce growth → slower payroll tax growth → accelerated strain.

Medicare: A More Complex Fiscal Challenge

Medicare, administered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, faces demographic and cost pressures simultaneously.

Unlike Social Security, Medicare expenditures are affected not only by age structure but by:

Healthcare inflation
Expanding medical technology
Increased chronic disease prevalence As Americans live longer:
More beneficiaries enter Medicare
Per-beneficiary healthcare spending increases with
Worker-to-beneficiary ratios

The Medicare Hospital Insurance trust fund faces projected strain within a similar 2030s timeframe.

Demographics do not operate in isolation — but they amplify cost trends.

Immigration and Economic Dynamism

The Economist article emphasizes another dimension often excluded from entitlement debates: innovation.

Immigrants are disproportionately represented among:

STEM professionals
Patent holders
High-growth startup founders
Fortune 500 company founders

Why does this matter for Social Security and Medicare?

Because entitlement funding depends not only on worker count — but on wages. Higher productivity → higher wages → higher payroll tax contributions.

If sustained reductions in migration dampen innovation or entrepreneurial activity, the effect on GDP growth and wage growth may be incremental — but over decades, incremental differences compound.

This is not ideological. It is economic modeling.

Labor Market Sensitivity

Certain industries — construction, agriculture, hospitality, eldercare — are particularly sensitive to migration flows.

When labor supply tightens:

Wages may rise
Output may slow
Inflationary pressures may increase

Rising wages increase payroll tax contributions, but slower output growth reduces overall economic expansion.

The balance between these forces is complex. But workforce size remains a key variable.

The Productivity Counterargument

Demographics are powerful, but not destiny. GDP equals:

Workers × Productivity per Worker

The United States retains structural advantages in artificial intelligence, capital formation, research universities, and energy production.

Productivity gains can offset slower labor force growth.

However, age structure still affects dependency ratios — the balance between workers and beneficiaries.

Entitlement systems are sensitive not only to GDP totals but to age distribution.

Policy Options Exist

Demographic pressure does not equal inevitability. Congress has multiple levers:

Adjust payroll tax rates
Raise or index retirement age
Modify benefit formulas
Reform Medicare reimbursement
Encourage workforce participation
Adjust immigration policy

Reforms enacted early can be gradual and predictable. Reforms enacted late tend to be sharper.

The arithmetic is transparent. The timing is political.

The Governance Test

The deeper question is not whether Social Security or Medicare will collapse. They will not.

The question is whether democratic institutions act while options remain broad — or wait until actuarial pressure narrows them.

Demographic trends move slowly.

Trust fund projections are published annually. Birth rates are reported monthly.

Nothing about this is hidden.

If fertility remains below replacement and net migration slows structurally, worker-to-beneficiary ratios decline.

If ratios decline, reform pressure increases. The issue is not ideology.

It is adjustment.

Final Reflection

America has historically offset aging pressures through renewal — through births, through immigration, through productivity growth.

If renewal slows, adjustment must increase. That is not a partisan observation.

It is actuarial.

The numbers will continue to move whether politics does or not.

The modern internet is not designed to deliver truth. It is designed to deliver engagement. Engagement rewards outrage, certainty, and speed — not nuance, humility, or verification. Political Awareness exists to slow the process down. We examine primary documents. We compare multiple credible sources. And we distinguish between projection and fact. We separate institutional structure from political theater. Our goal is not to persuade you toward a party. Our goal is to strengthen your capacity to think structurally about power, governance, and democratic systems. Because democracy does not fail all at once. It erodes when citizens stop examining how it functions.

Note: Political Awareness never authorizes its published communication on behalf of any candidate or their committees.